She is basically clueless since the Spartans have 7 verbal committments and all of them were done by late June.
So the article is either way late in being published which is inexcusable
(basically useless in terms of timeliness in getting this out since recruits can commit on any day) or she is showing her UM bias since she mistates the number
of Spartan verbals. See the NCAA forum for my list of Spartan verbals.
http://www.detnews.com/article/20090706/SPORTS0201/907060392/1361/U-M-vs.-MSU-recruiting--Different-approach--great-results--analyst-says







Personally on my computer there was another update at 10:22 pm, but no
correction on that aspect of the article. During one 12 day stretch the Spartans picked 4 verbal committments, not that this is high compared to some other
schools. That's why making comments about the number of recruits has to be done in a timely manner or else you make yourself out to be a fool when
published that late. The least Angel Eyes could have done is said when the interview took place if it was that old (> or = 12 days old sorry but my
computer doesn't have to right sign so I did them separately).

