1. (+) if they should be better than 2008
2. (-) if they should be worse than 2008
3. (=) if they should be equal to 2008
Answers as followed for: (in comparison to 2008)
WL Central
WL Western
WL Northern
Lakeland
Kettering
Mott
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Searn |
The KLAA - North teams going into 2009 ... +, - or = ? |
Lead | ||
|
All-Searn Hall of Fame
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Posts: 6488 12/15/08 3:55 PM Board Owner |
Three Choices to each answer: Each one compares the team to the one that lined up in 2008.
1. (+) if they should be better than 2008 2. (-) if they should be worse than 2008 3. (=) if they should be equal to 2008 Answers as followed for: (in comparison to 2008) WL Central WL Western WL Northern Lakeland Kettering Mott |
|||
|
|
||||
patsfan |
#1 | |||
|
WL Central +
WL Western + WL Northern = Lakeland = Kettering - Mott - |
||||
|
|
||||
ColonelKVC |
#2 | |||
|
Lakeland = ?!? No way, they'll be (-) for sure.
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
PastBack45 |
#3 | |||
|
Agree with ColonelKVC. Lakelands 08 team was one of their most talented groups that they will encounter for a while. Lakeland will still own the KLAA North
division next year, just not to the magnitude of the 08 season.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Quick Links