<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Wow - Muskegon.............. </title>
        <link>http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/topic/6178/t/Wow-Muskegon-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ No Rojo, no superstars, down 22 late in the 3rd, 6, count &#39;em, 6 turnovers and my Reds never said never.


For a team that will ........... as some say, &quot;roll over when the going gets tough&quot; and I can&#39;t blame after last year&#39;s fiasco, these young
men have sent chills up my spine and welled tears from my eyes.



So let it be written, so let it be done. ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:20:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:17:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Wow - Muskegon..............  ]]></title>
			<link>http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/reply/28367/t/Wow-Muskegon-.html#reply-28367</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">DSMOOV12 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Watching Grand Haven play I&#39;m sure you&#39;re used to seeing some flat, uninspired, failing and foul-smelling perfomances.
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
  EEEEEEAAAAAAASSSSSSSSYYYYYYY.  We are working on it.
</blockquote>
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (BIGREDS89)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/sreply/28367</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:17:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Wow - Muskegon..............  ]]></title>
			<link>http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/reply/28362/t/Wow-Muskegon-.html#reply-28362</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Contention of what, that Muskegon played poorly for three quarters? How insightful of you, I bet the other 7.000 people there didn&#39;t know that.
<br>
<br>
That one &quot;superior&quot; team you watched Friday? What happened to them when they played Muskegon? Maybe Rockford had a bad game, maybe Lowell as well.
Or, is it your contention that Muskegon shouldn&#39;t have bad games? As if our teenager&#39;s should be immune to falling flat on their faces from time to
time. Watching Grand Haven... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (DSMOOV12)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/sreply/28362</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:01:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Wow - Muskegon..............  ]]></title>
			<link>http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/reply/28320/t/Wow-Muskegon-.html#reply-28320</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yea, that was a pretty weak post, elderly.
<br>
<br>
For a guy who seems to be pretty intelligent, I think you were off with what you wrote.
<br>
<br>
Most teams would have just rolled over and called it quits being down by 22 in the second half. Yes, they had to have played bad to get into that situation,
but the fact that they came back from that shows how powerful this team is mentally and physically.
<br>
<br>
Credit to Annese for not letting his team give up. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (eagleCHAMP05)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/sreply/28320</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:36:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Wow - Muskegon..............  ]]></title>
			<link>http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/reply/28318/t/Wow-Muskegon-.html#reply-28318</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I stand by my previous posts. The numbers you cite merely confirm my contention! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (elderly)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/sreply/28318</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:17:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Wow - Muskegon..............  ]]></title>
			<link>http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/reply/28298/t/Wow-Muskegon-.html#reply-28298</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Elderly,
<br>
<br>
First, who said anything about crediting the kicker with greatness for onside kicks? All onside kicks require some assemblance of luck. Of course they got
lucky, did you think you were the only one that thought that? However, how lucky were they while committing six turnovers? My post and point was simply they
could have quit but didn&#39;t. I mean afterall, they didn&#39;t recover those onside kicks for touchdowns. They did have to get the ball in the endzone from
approx.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (DSMOOV12)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/sreply/28298</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Wow - Muskegon..............  ]]></title>
			<link>http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/reply/28287/t/Wow-Muskegon-.html#reply-28287</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Not badly.
<br>
<br>
In 11 games, he has contributed 70 points to the Broncos&#39; efforts.
<br>
<br>
Would like to see the Broncos make it to a bowl game, but bowl game or not, giving the Cardinals a tussle on Tuesday is more important than
<br>
any bowl - - - anywhere.
<br>
<br>
John seems to be enjoying campus life. He admires his coaches and feels fortunate to have the opportunity to know so many fine teammates. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (elderly)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/sreply/28287</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:36:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Wow - Muskegon..............  ]]></title>
			<link>http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/reply/28282/t/Wow-Muskegon-.html#reply-28282</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ yeah the onside kicks had some luck to them but the boys and the coaches can be praised for the never say die attitude that they played with. How is the
grandson doing?? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (BIGREDS89)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/sreply/28282</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:54:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Wow - Muskegon..............  ]]></title>
			<link>http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/reply/28277/t/Wow-Muskegon-.html#reply-28277</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Your Big Reds were extremely lucky! They extracted that win out of their collective annal orifice!
<br>
<br>
Possessing infinitely superior speed, size and skill - - - they farted, fumbled and failed most of the game. Please don&#39;t pretend that the back-to-back
onside kicks represented anything more than desperation verging on panic. The Big Reds were lucky in the extreme!
<br>
<br>
I was there. I observed closely. I understood what I observed.
<br>
<br>
The Muskegon kicker is of ordinary... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (elderly)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/sreply/28277</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:51:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Wow - Muskegon..............  ]]></title>
			<link>http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/topic/6178/t/Wow-Muskegon-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>No Rojo, no superstars, down 22 late in the 3rd, 6, count &#39;em, 6 turnovers and my Reds never said never.
<br>
<br>
For a team that will ........... as some say, &quot;roll over when the going gets tough&quot; and I can&#39;t blame after last year&#39;s fiasco, these young
men have sent chills up my spine and welled tears from my eyes.
<br>
<br>
<br>
So let it be written, so let it be done.</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (DSMOOV12)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://searnfootballforum.yuku.com/topic/6178</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:20:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>